SMT. SABA PARVEEN vs SRI R. F. NARIMAN ADVOCATE — AO/515/2012
Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section OTHER. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 08th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010014692012
Next Hearing
22nd July 2013
Filing Number
AO/1000464/2012
Filing Date
15-10-2012
Registration No
AO/515/2012
Registration Date
15-10-2012
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. SABA PARVEEN
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE
ALTMAS
Adv. ZAKIR ALI,MOHD.UMAR
SHAUKAT ALI
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE,ZAKIR ALI MOHD.UMAR
SMT. FIROZA BEGUM
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE
AMIR
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE,ZAKIR ALI MOHD.UMAR
Respondent(s)
SRI R. F. NARIMAN ADVOCATE
KALYAN SINGH
M/S TATA A.I.G. INSURANCE COMPANY
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MEDIATION DRIVE-MEDIATION FOR NATION -256
FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MEDIATION DRIVE-MEDIATION FOR NATION -256
ORDER MATTERS -17
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-02-2025 | FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MEDIATION DRIVE-MEDIATION FOR NATION -256 |
| 06-12-2024 | FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MEDIATION DRIVE-MEDIATION FOR NATION -256 |
| 14-12-2019 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
| 22-07-2013 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The appeal filed by Smt. Saba Parveen, Altmas, and Shaukat Ali (AO No. 515/2012) was dismissed by Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani on 08.05.2026. The dismissal was ordered on the grounds of non-prosecution, as no one appeared on behalf of the appellants during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The appeal filed by Smt. Saba Parveen, Altmas, and Shaukat Ali (AO No. 515/2012) was dismissed by Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani on 08.05.2026. The dismissal was ordered on the grounds of non-prosecution, as no one appeared on behalf of the appellants during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts