SMT. SABA PARVEEN vs SRI R. F. NARIMAN ADVOCATE — AO/515/2012
Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section OTHER. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 08th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010014692012
Filing Number
AO/1000464/2012
Filing Date
15-Oct-2012
Registration No
AO/515/2012
Registration Date
15-Oct-2012
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SABA PARVEEN
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE
-
2.ALTMAS
Adv. ZAKIR ALI,MOHD.UMAR
-
3.SHAUKAT ALI
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE,ZAKIR ALI MOHD.UMAR
-
4.SMT. FIROZA BEGUM
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE
-
5.AMIR
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE,ZAKIR ALI MOHD.UMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI R. F. NARIMAN ADVOCATE
-
2.KALYAN SINGH
-
3.M/S TATA A.I.G. INSURANCE COMPANY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF
The appeal filed by Smt. Saba Parveen, Altmas, and Shaukat Ali (AO No. 515/2012) was dismissed by Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani on 08.05.2026. The dismissal was ordered on the grounds of non-prosecution, as no one appeared on behalf of the appellants during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Feb-2025
For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive-Mediation For Nation -256
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Tandon
-
06-Dec-2024
For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive-Mediation For Nation -256
Registrar (Judicial)
-
14-Dec-2019
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh
-
22-Jul-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2012
Case filed
Registration No. AO/515/2012
The appeal filed by Smt. Saba Parveen, Altmas, and Shaukat Ali (AO No. 515/2012) was dismissed by Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani on 08.05.2026. The dismissal was ordered on the grounds of non-prosecution, as no one appeared on behalf of the appellants during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts