WAJID vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,PRIYANSHU GAIROLA — BA1 /131/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376,384,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010012732026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1 /651/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

BA1 /131/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376,384,504,506

Petitioner(s)

WAJID

Adv. SHASHI KANT SHANDILYA,VISHWAKETU VAIDYA,VISHWAKETU VAIDYA, ,VISHWAKETU VAIDYA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,PRIYANSHU GAIROLA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

23-01-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

13-04-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

23-03-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

10-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

15-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Wajid, accused of rape, extortion, and blackmail, primarily due to the 5-6 year delay in lodging the FIR with no plausible explanation, the absence of recovered photographs/videos central to the prosecution's case, and the applicant's clean criminal record. The court imposed conditions including passport surrender, maintaining peace, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Wajid, accused of rape, extortion, and blackmail, primarily due to the 5-6 year delay in lodging the FIR with no plausible explanation, the absence of recovered photographs/videos central to the prosecution's case, and the applicant's clean criminal record. The court imposed conditions including passport surrender, maintaining peace, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case