WAJID vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,PRIYANSHU GAIROLA — BA1/131/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376,384,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010012732026
Filing Number
BA1/651/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
BA1/131/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.WAJID
Adv. SHASHI KANT SHANDILYA,VISHWAKETU VAIDYA,VISHWAKETU VAIDYA, ,VISHWAKETU VAIDYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,PRIYANSHU GAIROLA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Wajid, accused of rape, extortion, and blackmail, primarily due to the 5-6 year delay in lodging the FIR with no plausible explanation, the absence of recovered photographs/videos central to the prosecution's case, and the applicant's clean criminal record. The court imposed conditions including passport surrender, maintaining peace, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
23-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
23-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/131/2026
The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Wajid, accused of rape, extortion, and blackmail, primarily due to the 5-6 year delay in lodging the FIR with no plausible explanation, the absence of recovered photographs/videos central to the prosecution's case, and the applicant's clean criminal record. The court imposed conditions including passport surrender, maintaining peace, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts