MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY vs LT. GENERAL R K JASBIR (RETIRED) — SA/49/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Apr-2013

CNR: UKHC010012072011

Filing Number

SA/1004930/2011

Filing Date

10-Jun-2011

Registration No

SA/49/2011

Registration Date

10-Jun-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

    Adv. RAHUL CONSUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LT. GENERAL R K JASBIR (RETIRED)

  2. 2.SHRI IRA SINGH

    Adv. PIYUSH GARG

  3. 3.SHRI BHRIGUVEER SINGH

    Adv. PIYUSH GARG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand affirmed the lower courts' decisions in favor of Lt. General R.K. Jasbir Singh (respondents), holding that they are the rightful owners of 0.4 hectares of land and entitled to possession from the Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority (MDDA), despite MDDA's argument that allottees of constructed flats are necessary parties. The court found the suit was filed within the 12-year limitation period under Article 65 of the Limitation Act (for possession), not the 3-year period under Article 58 (for declaration alone), and dismissed MDDA's second appeal with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

  7. 03-Apr-2025

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma

  8. 09-Dec-2024

    Old Matters -253

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  9. 02-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  10. 02-Dec-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  11. 15-Oct-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  12. 20-Aug-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  13. 28-Jun-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  14. 22-May-2024

    Old Matters -253

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  15. 04-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  16. 04-Apr-2024

    Old Matters -253

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  17. 15-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  18. 15-Mar-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma

  19. 29-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti SharmaView PDF

  20. 29-Sep-2023

    Old Matters -253

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma

  21. 21-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti SharmaView PDF

  22. 22-Apr-2022

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  23. 21-Apr-2022

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  24. 23-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  25. 15-Feb-2022

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  26. 21-Dec-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  27. 23-Jun-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal SinghView PDF

  28. 09-Sep-2018

    For Final Hearing -40

  29. 07-Dec-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  30. 24-Oct-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  31. 23-Oct-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  32. 04-Oct-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  33. 04-Sep-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  34. 26-Jul-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  35. 12-May-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  36. 11-May-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  37. 11-May-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  38. 12-Jan-2017

    For Final Hearing -40

  39. 23-Dec-2016

    For Final Hearing -40

  40. 25-Oct-2016

    For Final Hearing -40

  41. 19-Aug-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  42. 19-Aug-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  43. 19-Aug-2016

    For Final Hearing -40

  44. 29-Jul-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  45. 29-Jul-2016

    Orders On Applications -22

  46. 08-Jun-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  47. 08-Jun-2016

    Orders On Applications -22

  48. 07-Jun-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  49. 07-Jun-2016

    For Final Hearing -40

  50. 20-Apr-2015

    Orders On Applications -22

  51. 23-Mar-2015

    Orders On Applications -22

  52. 11-Mar-2015

    For Final Hearing -40

  53. 30-Apr-2014

    For Final Hearing -40

  54. 21-Apr-2014

    Orders On Applications -24

  55. 25-Mar-2014

    For Final Hearing -40

  56. 22-Apr-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 05-Jan-2012

    —

  58. 10-Jun-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/49/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand affirmed the lower courts' decisions in favor of Lt. General R.K. Jasbir Singh (respondents), holding that they are the rightful owners of 0.4 hectares of land and entitled to possession from the Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority (MDDA), despite MDDA's argument that allottees of constructed flats are necessary parties. The court found the suit was filed within the 12-year limitation period under Article 65 of the Limitation Act (for possession), not the 3-year period under Article 58 (for declaration alone), and dismissed MDDA's second appeal with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case