AARTIK vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/121/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/29/60. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 15th April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010009702026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPCRL/425/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/121/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/29/60

Petitioner(s)

AARTIK

Adv. TAJHAR QAYYUM,HIMANSHU AGARWAL,HIMANSHU AGARWAL, ,GULNAZ SIDDIQUI,HIMANSHU AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

MANOJ SINGH NAYAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

13-01-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

15-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

14-01-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

13-01-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
14-01-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
15-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

The writ petition (WPCRL No. 121 of 2026) was dismissed as infructuous by Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. The court found that the investigation had been completed and the charge sheet had already been filed, rendering the petition's purpose moot. Both the petitioner's counsel and the State had no objection to this dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition (WPCRL No. 121 of 2026) was dismissed as infructuous by Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. The court found that the investigation had been completed and the charge sheet had already been filed, rendering the petition's purpose moot. Both the petitioner's counsel and the State had no objection to this dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case