M/S AVON PESTICIDES vs KOMAL CHARAN — SPLA/10/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Disposed: Contested--GRANTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010008782026

Filing Number

SPLA/372/2026

Filing Date

10-Jan-2026

Registration No

SPLA/10/2026

Registration Date

10-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--GRANTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S AVON PESTICIDES

    Adv. MANI KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KOMAL CHARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Summary: In SPLA No. 10 of 2026 with CRLA No. 22 of 2026, Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani granted leave to appeal to M/s Avon Pesticides against Komal Charan. The court held that service of notices upon the respondent was sufficient, as the respondent's wife physically received the summons with her thumb impression on the receipt. Despite adequate service, the respondent failed to appear, but the court found sufficient grounds to grant the leave to appeal and directed the matter to be listed on 27.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 10-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SPLA/10/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In SPLA No. 10 of 2026 with CRLA No. 22 of 2026, Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani granted leave to appeal to M/s Avon Pesticides against Komal Charan. The court held that service of notices upon the respondent was sufficient, as the respondent's wife physically received the summons with her thumb impression on the receipt. Despite adequate service, the respondent failed to appear, but the court found sufficient grounds to grant the leave to appeal and directed the matter to be listed on 27.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case