MANOJ KUMAR KANDPAL vs RANJAN KUMAR MISHRA — CLCON/20/2026

Case under Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010008422026

Filing Number

CLCON/480/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

CLCON/20/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR KANDPAL

    Adv. ALOK DALAKOTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJAN KUMAR MISHRA

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    Case Summary: CLCON/20/2026 Petitioner Manoj Kumar Kandpal sought punishment of respondent Ranjan Kumar Mishra for willful disobedience of a court order dated 17.12.2024. The Court found the petition initially time-barred but accepted petitioner's argument that a competent authority's letter (dated 23.10.2025) refusing to act on the representation was contrary to the earlier order. The case was adjourned; notice was issued to the respondent to file response within one week, with the matter listed for hearing on 09.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CLCON/20/2026 Petitioner Manoj Kumar Kandpal sought punishment of respondent Ranjan Kumar Mishra for willful disobedience of a court order dated 17.12.2024. The Court found the petition initially time-barred but accepted petitioner's argument that a competent authority's letter (dated 23.10.2025) refusing to act on the representation was contrary to the earlier order. The case was adjourned; notice was issued to the respondent to file response within one week, with the matter listed for hearing on 09.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case