HARI PRAKASH vs RANJAN KUMAR MISHRA — CLCON/19/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010008402026

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

CLCON/478/2026

Filing Date

09-01-2026

Registration No

CLCON/19/2026

Registration Date

09-01-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

HARI PRAKASH

Adv. ALOK DALAKOTI

Respondent(s)

RANJAN KUMAR MISHRA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

09-02-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

09-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

05-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

05-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

CLCON/19/2026 - Summary Hari Prakash filed a contempt petition seeking punishment of Ranjan Kumar Mishra for willful disobedience of a court order dated 17.12.2024. The court found the petition initially time-barred but accepted petitioner's argument that a subsequent letter from the competent authority (dated 23.10.2025) stating the matter would be referred to a larger bench justified the delay. The court issued notice to the respondent and adjourned the case to 09.06.2026 for his response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CLCON/19/2026 - Summary Hari Prakash filed a contempt petition seeking punishment of Ranjan Kumar Mishra for willful disobedience of a court order dated 17.12.2024. The court found the petition initially time-barred but accepted petitioner's argument that a subsequent letter from the competent authority (dated 23.10.2025) stating the matter would be referred to a larger bench justified the delay. The court issued notice to the respondent and adjourned the case to 09.06.2026 for his response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case