HARI PRAKASH vs RANJAN KUMAR MISHRA — CLCON/19/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010008402026

Filing Number

CLCON/478/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

CLCON/19/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI PRAKASH

    Adv. ALOK DALAKOTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJAN KUMAR MISHRA

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    CLCON/19/2026 - Summary Hari Prakash filed a contempt petition seeking punishment of Ranjan Kumar Mishra for willful disobedience of a court order dated 17.12.2024. The court found the petition initially time-barred but accepted petitioner's argument that a subsequent letter from the competent authority (dated 23.10.2025) stating the matter would be referred to a larger bench justified the delay. The court issued notice to the respondent and adjourned the case to 09.06.2026 for his response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CLCON/19/2026 - Summary Hari Prakash filed a contempt petition seeking punishment of Ranjan Kumar Mishra for willful disobedience of a court order dated 17.12.2024. The court found the petition initially time-barred but accepted petitioner's argument that a subsequent letter from the competent authority (dated 23.10.2025) stating the matter would be referred to a larger bench justified the delay. The court issued notice to the respondent and adjourned the case to 09.06.2026 for his response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case