JITENDRA KUMAR GUPTA vs SURAJ PRAKASH GULATI — WPMS/940/2015
Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 17th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010006992015
Next Hearing
31st August 2015
Filing Number
WPMS/1004224/2015
Filing Date
21-04-2015
Registration No
WPMS/940/2015
Registration Date
21-04-2015
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE ORDER OF PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY RENT CONTROL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JITENDRA KUMAR GUPTA
Adv. VIKAS BAHUGUNA, KULDEEP S.RAWAL,P. S. BISHT,SIDDHARTHA SINGH
Respondent(s)
SURAJ PRAKASH GULATI
Adv. ROHIT GUPTA,PIYUSH GARG 1123
SMT SHANTI DEVI GULATI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
OLD MATTERS -253
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDER ON APPLICATIONS (AS DEFECTIVE) -237
ORDER ON APPLICATIONS (AS DEFECTIVE) -237
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-12-2024 | OLD MATTERS -253 |
| 07-11-2024 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 09-09-2024 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 06-05-2024 | ORDER ON APPLICATIONS (AS DEFECTIVE) -237 |
| 27-02-2024 | ORDER ON APPLICATIONS (AS DEFECTIVE) -237 |
Orders
Jitendra Kumar Gupta's writ petition challenging a 2015 rent control appeal judgment was dismissed as withdrawn on 17.04.2026. The petitioner's legal representatives acknowledged the respondents' ownership rights, handed over vacant possession of the disputed property, settled all accounts, and indicated unwillingness to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Jitendra Kumar Gupta's writ petition challenging a 2015 rent control appeal judgment was dismissed as withdrawn on 17.04.2026. The petitioner's legal representatives acknowledged the respondents' ownership rights, handed over vacant possession of the disputed property, settled all accounts, and indicated unwillingness to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts