HEMCHANDRA SHARMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/52/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,351,352. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010005342026

Filing Number

C528/246/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

C528/52/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,351,352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMCHANDRA SHARMA

    Adv. A M SAKLANI,FAIZAN AHMED,FAIZAN AHMED, ,FAIZAN AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MUNNI DEVI

    Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court allowed the compounding application filed by Hemchandra Sharma and quashed all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1129 of 2025 under Sections 115, 351, and 352 of BNS, after the applicant and respondent reached a compromise and expressed unwillingness to pursue the case further. Although the State opposed the application arguing certain offences were non-compoundable, the court approved the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Personal Appearance -4

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/52/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court allowed the compounding application filed by Hemchandra Sharma and quashed all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1129 of 2025 under Sections 115, 351, and 352 of BNS, after the applicant and respondent reached a compromise and expressed unwillingness to pursue the case further. Although the State opposed the application arguing certain offences were non-compoundable, the court approved the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case