SMT. SAMPATI DEVI vs MUKESH CHAND RAMOLA Advocate - SARVESH AGARWAL — AO/64/2012

Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section OTHER. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010005182012

Next Hearing

30th May 2026

Filing Number

AO/1000586/2012

Filing Date

27-02-2012

Registration No

AO/64/2012

Registration Date

27-02-2012

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section OTHER

Petitioner(s)

SMT. SAMPATI DEVI

Adv. NIRANJAN BHATT

NAVEEN BHATT (ADOPTED)

Respondent(s)

MUKESH CHAND RAMOLA Advocate - SARVESH AGARWAL

BIJENDRA SINGH ALIAS VIJAYPAL SINGH

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Adv. SARVESH AGARWAL,PULAK AGARWAL BHARAT TEWARI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

30-05-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

10-04-2021

ORDER MATTERS (TO REFER FOR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT) -15

14-09-2019

ORDER MATTERS (TO REFER FOR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT) -15

08-12-2018

ORDER MATTERS (TO REFER FOR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT) -15

26-09-2018

ORDER MATTERS -17

Orders

11-04-2018
17-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

In AO 64/2012, the court adjourned the case and directed notices be issued to respondent no.1 (returnable within six weeks), with implementation steps to be completed within one week. The matter was listed for May 30, 2026, with a warning that failure to comply with directions would result in dismissal of the appeal without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In AO 64/2012, the court adjourned the case and directed notices be issued to respondent no.1 (returnable within six weeks), with implementation steps to be completed within one week. The matter was listed for May 30, 2026, with a warning that failure to comply with directions would result in dismissal of the appeal without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case