ASHWANI KUMAR VIJAY LAKSHMI vs SMT. BABY CHAUDARY — AO/523/2012

Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section OTHER. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 08th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010004862012

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

09th September 2017

Filing Number

AO/1000473/2012

Filing Date

29-10-2012

Registration No

AO/523/2012

Registration Date

29-10-2012

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section OTHER

Petitioner(s)

ASHWANI KUMAR VIJAY LAKSHMI

Respondent(s)

SMT. BABY CHAUDARY

TEJPAL (DRIVER)

THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

Adv. RAJENDRA TAMTA,VINAY BHATT MOHD SHAFY

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

13-08-2022

ORDER MATTERS -17

24-04-2025

FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MEDIATION DRIVE-MEDIATION FOR NATION -256

06-03-2025

FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MEDIATION DRIVE-MEDIATION FOR NATION -256

27-02-2025

FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MEDIATION DRIVE-MEDIATION FOR NATION -256

06-12-2024

FOR REFERRAL TO THE SPECIAL MEDIATION DRIVE-MEDIATION FOR NATION -256

Orders

08-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

The appeal filed by Ashwani Kumar Vijay Lakshmi (AO No.523/2012) was dismissed in non-prosecution on 08.05.2026 by Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani. The appellant failed to appear before the court, while respondent no.3 (The New India Insurance Company Ltd) was represented by Senior Advocate T.A. Khan and Ms. Suraiya Naaz. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The appeal filed by Ashwani Kumar Vijay Lakshmi (AO No.523/2012) was dismissed in non-prosecution on 08.05.2026 by Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani. The appellant failed to appear before the court, while respondent no.3 (The New India Insurance Company Ltd) was represented by Senior Advocate T.A. Khan and Ms. Suraiya Naaz. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case