SH. GOVIND PRASAD JOSHI vs SH. KANTI PRASAD JOSHI — SA/1/2010

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010003992010

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

SA/1004522/2010

Filing Date

11-01-2010

Registration No

SA/1/2010

Registration Date

11-01-2010

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

SH. GOVIND PRASAD JOSHI

Adv. NIRANJAN BHATT, ,INDER PAL KOHLI

Respondent(s)

SH. KANTI PRASAD JOSHI

Adv. ,RAVI BABULKAR,RAVI BABULKAR,RAVI BISHT 1123

GURU DAYAL SINGH(Legal Heir)2.

GURKIT KAUR2.

SARDAR BALJIT SINGH (SINCE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)2.2.

HARJIT KAUR2.2.

MERBHAN SINGH2.2.

TEJKAMAL SINGH2.2.

JAGJEET SINGH2.

SARDAR HARI SINGH

HARI KANT JOSHI

Adv. LOKENDRA DOBHAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

11-06-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

10-07-2025

FOR FINAL HEARING -40

24-04-2025

FOR FINAL HEARING -40

09-03-2024

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

21-02-2024

OLD MATTERS -253

Orders

24-02-2010

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Case Summary: SA 1/2010 The court (Hon'ble Siddhartha Sah, J.) disposed of two urgency applications (IA Nos. 2339/2025 and 2340/2026) filed on the ground that the case was unlisted. The case has been adjourned and scheduled for next hearing on 11.06.2026, recognizing the urgency demonstrated by respondent no.3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA 1/2010 The court (Hon'ble Siddhartha Sah, J.) disposed of two urgency applications (IA Nos. 2339/2025 and 2340/2026) filed on the ground that the case was unlisted. The case has been adjourned and scheduled for next hearing on 11.06.2026, recognizing the urgency demonstrated by respondent no.3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case