CHANDAN SINGH KUNWAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/12/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010003482026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA/164/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
CRLA/12/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDAN SINGH KUNWAR
Adv. H S RAWAL,AMIT KAPRI,AMIT KAPRI, ,AMIT KAPRI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-01-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 04-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 27-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary of CRLA No. 12/2026 (Chandan Singh Kunwar v. State of Uttarakhand): The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to Chandan Singh Kunwar, who was convicted under Section 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court found critical evidentiary flaws in the prosecution case—specifically, the specimen seal prepared at the recovery site bore an FIR number that was recorded much later, which the State counsel admitted but could not explain. The court suspended the execution of sentence and released the appellant on bail pending appeal, requiring a personal bond and two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRLA No. 12/2026 (Chandan Singh Kunwar v. State of Uttarakhand): The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to Chandan Singh Kunwar, who was convicted under Section 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court found critical evidentiary flaws in the prosecution case—specifically, the specimen seal prepared at the recovery site bore an FIR number that was recorded much later, which the State counsel admitted but could not explain. The court suspended the execution of sentence and released the appellant on bail pending appeal, requiring a personal bond and two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts