SANJAY SINGH KATHAYAT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/11/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20B(II)(C). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010003462026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA/163/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
CRLA/11/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAY SINGH KATHAYAT
Adv. H S RAWAL,AMIT KAPRI,AMIT KAPRI, ,AMIT KAPRI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-01-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 04-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 27-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: CRLA 11/2026 - Sanjay Singh Kathayat v. State of Uttarakhand Sanjay Singh Kathayat was convicted under Section 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for possession of charas. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed his bail application, finding critical procedural irregularities: the specimen seal prepared at the recovery site bore an FIR number that was logged after the recovery occurred, which the prosecution could not explain. The court suspended sentence execution and released the appellant on bail pending appeal, requiring personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRLA 11/2026 - Sanjay Singh Kathayat v. State of Uttarakhand Sanjay Singh Kathayat was convicted under Section 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for possession of charas. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed his bail application, finding critical procedural irregularities: the specimen seal prepared at the recovery site bore an FIR number that was logged after the recovery occurred, which the prosecution could not explain. The court suspended sentence execution and released the appellant on bail pending appeal, requiring personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts