RAMVILAS SHARIQ KHURSHID (LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1 /20/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),65(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010002802026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1 /122/2026

Filing Date

05-01-2026

Registration No

BA1 /20/2026

Registration Date

05-01-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),65(1)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 5(L)/6

Petitioner(s)

RAMVILAS SHARIQ KHURSHID (LEGAL AID)

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

07-01-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

25-03-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

12-03-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

17-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Ramvilas, who was accused under POCSO Act and BNS sections for allegedly causing a 15-year-old girl to go missing. Though the victim's statement favored the applicant and he had no prior criminal history, the court found no sufficient grounds for bail, emphasizing the heinous nature of POCSO offenses involving a minor victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Ramvilas, who was accused under POCSO Act and BNS sections for allegedly causing a 15-year-old girl to go missing. Though the victim's statement favored the applicant and he had no prior criminal history, the court found no sufficient grounds for bail, emphasizing the heinous nature of POCSO offenses involving a minor victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case