RAMVILAS SHARIQ KHURSHID (LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/20/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),65(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010002802026
Filing Number
BA1/122/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
BA1/20/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMVILAS SHARIQ KHURSHID (LEGAL AID)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Ramvilas, who was accused under POCSO Act and BNS sections for allegedly causing a 15-year-old girl to go missing. Though the victim's statement favored the applicant and he had no prior criminal history, the court found no sufficient grounds for bail, emphasizing the heinous nature of POCSO offenses involving a minor victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
17-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
07-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/20/2026
Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Ramvilas, who was accused under POCSO Act and BNS sections for allegedly causing a 15-year-old girl to go missing. Though the victim's statement favored the applicant and he had no prior criminal history, the court found no sufficient grounds for bail, emphasizing the heinous nature of POCSO offenses involving a minor victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts