RAHUL SAXENA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSB/20/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010002532026

Filing Number

WPSB/148/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

WPSB/20/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL SAXENA

    Adv. PULAK RAJ MULLICK,SAHIL MULLICK,SAHIL MULLICK, ,SAHIL MULLICK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DIRECTOR MEDICAL EDUCATION

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.UTTARAKHAND MEDICAL SERVICE SELECTION BOARD

    Adv. RAMJI SHRIVASTAVA

  5. 5.NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION

    Adv. YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA

  6. 6.RASHMI PANDEY

  7. 7.ATANU SEN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    In WPSB No. 513 of 2025 (Ravita Kumari v. State of Uttarakhand), the High Court of Uttarakhand held that service of notice on respondents 6-11 was sufficient. Respondent No. 4 was granted two weeks' time to file a counter-affidavit, while the NMC confirmed that existing regulations on record suffice without a separate counter-affidavit. The case is adjourned for listing after two weeks along with the connected matter (WPSB No. 20 of 2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSB/20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WPSB No. 513 of 2025 (Ravita Kumari v. State of Uttarakhand), the High Court of Uttarakhand held that service of notice on respondents 6-11 was sufficient. Respondent No. 4 was granted two weeks' time to file a counter-affidavit, while the NMC confirmed that existing regulations on record suffice without a separate counter-affidavit. The case is adjourned for listing after two weeks along with the connected matter (WPSB No. 20 of 2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case