ANKUR CHAUHAN NIVESSH BAHUGUNA, DEVENDRA KR.MISHRA, ,C S GAUTAM,VIKRAMADITYA SHAH,SACHIN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF U.K. DEHRADUN Advocate - G.A. — C482/21/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) Section 156(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010002402023
Filing Number
C482/121/2023
Filing Date
05-01-2023
Registration No
C482/21/2023
Registration Date
05-01-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANKUR CHAUHAN NIVESSH BAHUGUNA, DEVENDRA KR.MISHRA, ,C S GAUTAM,VIKRAMADITYA SHAH,SACHIN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF U.K. DEHRADUN Advocate - G.A.
KAVITA
Adv. S.S.YADAV, S.P.SHARMA
KAMAL
Adv. S.S.YADAV, S.P.SHARMA
MADHUSHUDAN
Adv. S.S.YADAV, S.P.SHARMA
PAWAN
Adv. S.S.YADAV, S.P.SHARMA
UDYAPAL
Adv. S.S.YADAV, S.P.SHARMA
BRIJPAL
Adv. S.S.YADAV, S.P.SHARMA
RAKHI
Adv. S.S.YADAV, S.P.SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FOR FINAL HEARING -40
FOR FINAL HEARING -40
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-01-2023 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 31-12-2025 | FOR FINAL HEARING -40 |
| 21-11-2025 | FOR FINAL HEARING -40 |
| 28-10-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 02-09-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
Orders
Case Summary: C482/21/2023 The court allowed the criminal miscellaneous application and set aside orders from the lower courts that had dismissed the applicant's Section 156(3) CrPC application seeking FIR registration. The court found merit in the applicant's argument that the Magistrate rejected the application without proper consideration despite prima facie cognizable offence being disclosed. The matter was remanded to the trial court with directions to reconsider the application in accordance with Supreme Court precedent requiring FIR registration when a complaint discloses cognizable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C482/21/2023 The court allowed the criminal miscellaneous application and set aside orders from the lower courts that had dismissed the applicant's Section 156(3) CrPC application seeking FIR registration. The court found merit in the applicant's argument that the Magistrate rejected the application without proper consideration despite prima facie cognizable offence being disclosed. The matter was remanded to the trial court with directions to reconsider the application in accordance with Supreme Court precedent requiring FIR registration when a complaint discloses cognizable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts