SHASHI THAPLIYAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS /15/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010001512026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS /81/2026

Filing Date

03-01-2026

Registration No

WPSS /15/2026

Registration Date

03-01-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SHASHI THAPLIYAL

Adv. NIRANJAN BHATT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DIRECTOR

Adv. C.S.C.

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

DEPUTY EDUCATION OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

05-01-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The court dismissed the writ petition filed by a petitioner challenging the rejection of her representation for transfer to an institution of her choice after promotion. The court held that posting decisions are within the employer's discretionary authority and upheld the rejection as valid, finding no grounds for judicial interference despite a subsequent vacancy arising at the preferred institution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition filed by a petitioner challenging the rejection of her representation for transfer to an institution of her choice after promotion. The court held that posting decisions are within the employer's discretionary authority and upheld the rejection as valid, finding no grounds for judicial interference despite a subsequent vacancy arising at the preferred institution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case