VIVEK SEHGAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/11/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act No. 43 of 2005) Section 12. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010001272026

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

C528/58/2026

Filing Date

03-01-2026

Registration No

C528/11/2026

Registration Date

03-01-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act No. 43 of 2005) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

VIVEK SEHGAL

Adv. AMAR MURTI SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

SHILPI

Adv. VIPUL SHARMA,KHUSHBOO TIWARI SHARMA MANEESH BISHT NIVESH BAHUGUNA ANKURIT RAJ DAVID

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

06-01-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

17-06-2026

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

20-05-2026

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

06-05-2026

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

02-04-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

Orders

06-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: C528/11/2026 In this maintenance case, petitioner Vivek Sehgal was found to have outstanding maintenance arrears of ₹40,000. The court accepted his undertaking to transfer ₹30,000 to his wife's bank account by 07.05.2026. The matter was adjourned to 20.05.2026 with both parties required to appear personally, and existing interim orders were continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/11/2026 In this maintenance case, petitioner Vivek Sehgal was found to have outstanding maintenance arrears of ₹40,000. The court accepted his undertaking to transfer ₹30,000 to his wife's bank account by 07.05.2026. The matter was adjourned to 20.05.2026 with both parties required to appear personally, and existing interim orders were continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case