ASHISH KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1 /3/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8,22,29,60. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010000812026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1 /36/2026

Filing Date

03-01-2026

Registration No

BA1 /3/2026

Registration Date

03-01-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8,22,29,60

Petitioner(s)

ASHISH KUMAR

Adv. AKHIL KUMAR SAH,AYUSH AGRAWAL,AYUSH AGRAWAL, ,MOHAMMAD KAMRAN,SURAJ SINGH BISHT,AYUSH AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

06-01-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

13-04-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

12-03-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

17-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

15-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Summary The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Ashish Kumar, accused of NDPS Act violations for possessing prohibited medicines. The court found that considering the overall facts and circumstances—including the applicant's clean criminal record, lengthy jail detention since August 2025, authorization as a medical store owner with pharmacist license, and the recovered quantity being below commercial limits—he made out a case for bail. He was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties, with conditions to cooperate in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Ashish Kumar, accused of NDPS Act violations for possessing prohibited medicines. The court found that considering the overall facts and circumstances—including the applicant's clean criminal record, lengthy jail detention since August 2025, authorization as a medical store owner with pharmacist license, and the recovered quantity being below commercial limits—he made out a case for bail. He was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties, with conditions to cooperate in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case