FAZLA vs MOHAMMAD AHMAD Advocate - NIKHIL SINGHAL, ,H C PATHAK — WPMS/1621/2015

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Oct-2015

CNR: UKHC010000242015

Filing Number

WPMS/1007489/2015

Filing Date

03-Jul-2015

Registration No

WPMS/1621/2015

Registration Date

03-Jul-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF REVENUE COURT IN CONSOLIDATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAZLA

    Adv. Advocate- ,HIMANSHU PAL,TAPAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD AHMAD Advocate - NIKHIL SINGHAL, ,H C PATHAK

  2. 2.JAMEEL

  3. 3.SALEEM

  4. 4.JAHANGEER

  5. 5.MANSAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: WPMS 1621/2015 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Fazla's petition challenging an order allowing an amendment to a pending consolidation revision. The Deputy Director of Consolidation had permitted the addition of four new respondents (Jameel, Saleem, Jahangeer, and Mansab) to Revision 56/2013-2014. The court upheld this amendment as justified because: (1) the new parties were proper and necessary parties who would be affected by the revision's outcome; (2) the amendment complied with the High Court's 2013 directions requiring all affected parties to receive proper hearing in consolidation proceedings; and (3) no party would be prejudiced by their impleadment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    After Fresh Matters -128

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  13. 02-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  15. 26-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  16. 26-Aug-2025

    For Final Hearing -40

    Daily Lok Adalat

  17. 26-Aug-2025

    Revoked

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  18. 08-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  19. 18-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  20. 18-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  21. 10-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  22. 21-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipin SanghiView PDF

  23. 23-Nov-2022
  24. 03-Nov-2022
  25. 03-Nov-2022

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  26. 31-Dec-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  27. 24-Sep-2018

    Admission Matters -25

  28. 09-Jun-2017

    Admission Matters -25

  29. 23-Jun-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal SinghView PDF

  30. 23-Jun-2016

    Admission Matters -25

  31. 04-Jan-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal SinghView PDF

  32. 04-Jan-2016

    Admission Matters -25

  33. 18-Nov-2015

    Admission Matters -25

  34. 08-Oct-2015

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal SinghView PDF

  35. 08-Oct-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 06-Jul-2015
  37. 03-Jul-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1621/2015

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WPMS 1621/2015 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Fazla's petition challenging an order allowing an amendment to a pending consolidation revision. The Deputy Director of Consolidation had permitted the addition of four new respondents (Jameel, Saleem, Jahangeer, and Mansab) to Revision 56/2013-2014. The court upheld this amendment as justified because: (1) the new parties were proper and necessary parties who would be affected by the revision's outcome; (2) the amendment complied with the High Court's 2013 directions requiring all affected parties to receive proper hearing in consolidation proceedings; and (3) no party would be prejudiced by their impleadment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case