SRI KESHAB DAS vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - GOVT. ADVOCATE, ,Mr PRADYUMNA GAUTAM — WP(C)/191/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: TRHC010020362025

Filing Number

WP(C)/1508/2025

Filing Date

03-Dec-2025

Registration No

WP(C)/191/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITION RELATING TO SERVICE MATTER ( 2 )

Sub-Category

REGULARISATION OF SERVICE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI KESHAB DAS

    Adv. MR DIBYENDU SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - GOVT. ADVOCATE, ,Mr PRADYUMNA GAUTAM

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR

  3. 3.THE PRINCIPAL

  4. 4.THE PRINCIPAL OFFICER-IN-CHARGE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit PalitView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 191/2026 The petition filed by Sri Keshab Das against The State of Tripura and others was adjourned on 08/05/2026 after the petitioner failed to appear. The State-respondents filed their counter affidavit. The court listed the matter for hearing in its usual course and permitted the petitioner to file a rejoinder in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Motion

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit PalitView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/191/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 191/2026 The petition filed by Sri Keshab Das against The State of Tripura and others was adjourned on 08/05/2026 after the petitioner failed to appear. The State-respondents filed their counter affidavit. The court listed the matter for hearing in its usual course and permitted the petitioner to file a rejoinder in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case