Smti Sangita Das MS AYESHA S HIRAWAT, ,MS PIYALI CHAKRABORTY,MS MEGHA SARKAR,MR DHIMAN GOPE,Mr SUBRATA SARKAR vs The State of Tripura Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — AB/35/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 308(2),356(2),351(3),79,238. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: TRHC010009832026

e-Filing Number

02-06-2026

Filing Number

AB/299/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

AB/35/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 308(2),356(2),351(3),79,238
Information Technology Act Section 66E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smti Sangita Das MS AYESHA S HIRAWAT, ,MS PIYALI CHAKRABORTY,MS MEGHA SARKAR,MR DHIMAN GOPE,Mr SUBRATA SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Tripura Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    For Motion

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta PurkayasthaView PDF

    Case Summary - AB No. 35 of 2026 The High Court of Tripura adjourned the matter to 11.06.2026. The court directed the Public Prosecutor to produce a CD on the next date and allowed the petitioner to submit additional documents after providing copies to the opposing side. The de-facto complainant was ordered to be made a party to the case and notified through the Public Prosecutor, with requisite submissions due within three days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AB/35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - AB No. 35 of 2026 The High Court of Tripura adjourned the matter to 11.06.2026. The court directed the Public Prosecutor to produce a CD on the next date and allowed the petitioner to submit additional documents after providing copies to the opposing side. The de-facto complainant was ordered to be made a party to the case and notified through the Public Prosecutor, with requisite submissions due within three days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case