Solanki Chowdhury vs The State of Tripura and 7 others Advocate - GOVT. ADVOCATE — WP(C)/359/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
CNR: TRHC010009282026
Filing Number
WP(C)/654/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/359/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITION RELATING TO SERVICE MATTER ( 2 )
Sub-Category
RECRUITMENT ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Solanki Chowdhury
Adv. MR DIPJYOTI PAUL,MS ARADHITA DEBBARMA,MS ARADHITA DEBBARMA, ,MR PR BARMAN,MR SAMARJIT BHATTACHARJEE,MR KAWSIK NATH,MS SUTAPA DEB BARMAN,MS ARADHITA DEBBARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Tripura and 7 others Advocate - GOVT. ADVOCATE
-
2.The Principal Secretary,
-
3.The Director of Secondary Education,
-
4.Teachers' Recruitment Board, Tripura (TRBT)
-
5.The Member Secretary,
-
6.The Controller of Examinations,
-
7.Faruk Islam,
-
8.Sampa Debnath,
Case History
-
27-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Jul-2026
For Motion
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit PalitView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 359/2025 - Solanki Chowdhury v. The State of Tripura The petition challenges the exclusion of the petitioner from appointment despite scoring 116 marks in the STPGT 2025 selection test, while similarly-scoring candidates were appointed. The court adjourned the matter to 27.07.2026, waived formal notice for respondents 1-6, and directed the petitioner to serve notice on respondents 7-8 within seven days via registered post. Respondents are permitted to file counter-affidavits during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/359/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 359/2025 - Solanki Chowdhury v. The State of Tripura The petition challenges the exclusion of the petitioner from appointment despite scoring 116 marks in the STPGT 2025 selection test, while similarly-scoring candidates were appointed. The court adjourned the matter to 27.07.2026, waived formal notice for respondents 1-6, and directed the petitioner to serve notice on respondents 7-8 within seven days via registered post. Respondents are permitted to file counter-affidavits during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts