Shri Jogendra Chandra Samanta MS. ADWITIYA CHAKRABORTY, ,Mr SOMIK DEB,MR JISHAN SAMEED vs Union of India and 3 others Advocate - DY. S.G.I. — WP(C)/337/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: TRHC010008632026

Filing Number

WP(C)/610/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/337/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITION RELATING TO SERVICE MATTER ( 2 )

Sub-Category

PENSION MATTER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri Jogendra Chandra Samanta MS. ADWITIYA CHAKRABORTY, ,Mr SOMIK DEB,MR JISHAN SAMEED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India and 3 others Advocate - DY. S.G.I.

  2. 2.Secretary,

  3. 3.The Chief Postmaster General,

  4. 4.Accounts Officer (A and P),

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta PurkayasthaView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP(C) No. 337/2026 before the High Court of Tripura, the court heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel on May 20, 2026. The respondent's counsel (Dy.S.G.I.) accepted notice and sought adjournment to file a Counter Affidavit. The court granted the adjournment, directed the petitioner to furnish two copies of the writ petition with annexures to the Dy.S.G.I., and adjourned the matter for four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    For Motion

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/337/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP(C) No. 337/2026 before the High Court of Tripura, the court heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel on May 20, 2026. The respondent's counsel (Dy.S.G.I.) accepted notice and sought adjournment to file a Counter Affidavit. The court granted the adjournment, directed the petitioner to furnish two copies of the writ petition with annexures to the Dy.S.G.I., and adjourned the matter for four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case