Sri Goutam Das and Ors. vs Dr. K. Sasikumar, IFS and Ors. — Cont.Cas(C)/22/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section Section 12. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: TRHC010008582026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/605/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/22/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Goutam Das and Ors.

    Adv. MR SAMARJIT BHATTACHARJEE,MR PR BARMAN,MR PR BARMAN, ,MR KAWSIK NATH,MS ARADHITA DEBBARMA,MR DIPJYOTI PAUL,MR PR BARMAN

  2. 2.Sri Tutan Roy

  3. 3.Smt Sukriti Biswas

  4. 4.Smt Jhumeli Debbarma

  5. 5.Sri Umasankar Acharjee

  6. 6.Sri Raghu Pati Singh

  7. 7.Smt Sujata Das

  8. 8.Sri Nirmal Kanti Saha

  9. 9.Sri Ramjatan Pashi

  10. 10.Sri Ramu Roy

  11. 11.Sri Subhankar Datta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dr. K. Sasikumar, IFS and Ors.

  2. 2.Smt. Sumitra Debnath

  3. 3.Shri Subhasis Das,

  4. 4.Ms. Ranjana Chopra

  5. 5.Dr. Pratima

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta PurkayasthaView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Tripura found that respondents failed to comply with a prior judgment (dated 28.11.2025) directing absorption of petitioners into NESTS within four months. The court issued notice to Respondent Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for non-compliance. The matter was adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    For Motion

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Datta Purkayastha

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Tripura found that respondents failed to comply with a prior judgment (dated 28.11.2025) directing absorption of petitioners into NESTS within four months. The court issued notice to Respondent Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for non-compliance. The matter was adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case