Smt. Bishnu Priya Das vs The Union of India and 5 others Advocate - DY. S.G.I. — WP(C)/302/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: TRHC010007262026

Filing Number

WP(C)/512/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/302/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

DIE-IN-HARNESS ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Bishnu Priya Das

    Adv. Mrs SUJATA DEB (GUPTA), MS ANKITA SAHA,MR RAM PRASAD GOPE,MS SANGITA RANI PAUL,MR BIKRAM PAUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Union of India and 5 others Advocate - DY. S.G.I.

  2. 2.The Commissioner and Secretary.

  3. 3.The Director General,

  4. 4.The Commandant,

  5. 5.The Deputy Commandant

  6. 6.Smt. Sanchita Sutradhar,

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    For Motion

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP(C) No.302/2026, the High Court of Tripura heard a petition by Smt. Bishnu Priya Das against the Union of India regarding a compassionate appointment. The Court accepted notice on behalf of respondents 1-5 and dismissed respondent 6 as unnecessary since she had already agreed to provide a No Objection Certificate (NOC) in favor of the petitioner. The matter was adjourned to 18.06.2026 with directions for the respondents to file a counter affidavit in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP(C) No.302/2026, the High Court of Tripura heard a petition by Smt. Bishnu Priya Das against the Union of India regarding a compassionate appointment. The Court accepted notice on behalf of respondents 1-5 and dismissed respondent 6 as unnecessary since she had already agreed to provide a No Objection Certificate (NOC) in favor of the petitioner. The matter was adjourned to 18.06.2026 with directions for the respondents to file a counter affidavit in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case