Smt. Ankurita Das on behalf of Mantanu Saha Tania Das, ,MR HARE KRISHNA BHOWMIK,MR AMIT SAHA,MR SUBHRANIL BHOWMIK,MR ANIRBAN ACHARJEE,MR SUPEN DAS vs The State of Tripura Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — BA /62/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 21(c),29. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th April 2026.
CNR: TRHC010005252026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
BA /156/2026
Filing Date
24-03-2026
Registration No
BA /62/2026
Registration Date
25-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Bail ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Ankurita Das on behalf of Mantanu Saha Tania Das, ,MR HARE KRISHNA BHOWMIK,MR AMIT SAHA,MR SUBHRANIL BHOWMIK,MR ANIRBAN ACHARJEE,MR SUPEN DAS
Respondent(s)
The State of Tripura Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
FOR MOTION
FOR HEARING
FOR MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | FOR MOTION | |
| 06-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR MOTION |
Orders
The High Court of Tripura rejected the bail application of Mantanu Saha, accused under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act for alleged involvement in trafficking 90,000 cough syrup bottles. The court found prima facie incriminating evidence including permits naming the accused as recipient, witness statements linking him to the consignment delivery, and recovered cash, determining that the rigorous provisions of Section 37 of NDPS Act apply due to the large quantity of contraband involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Tripura rejected the bail application of Mantanu Saha, accused under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act for alleged involvement in trafficking 90,000 cough syrup bottles. The court found prima facie incriminating evidence including permits naming the accused as recipient, witness statements linking him to the consignment delivery, and recovered cash, determining that the rigorous provisions of Section 37 of NDPS Act apply due to the large quantity of contraband involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts