Sri Ranjit Kumar Sahni on behalf of Smt. Rina Devi and Ors. Agniva Chakrabarti, ,Mr DEBALAY BHATTACHARYA,MS RASHMI BHATTACHARJEE,MR SAMAR DAS,MR MIJANUR RAHAMAN vs The State of Tripura Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — BA /65/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20(b)(ii)(c),29. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th April 2026.

CNR: TRHC010005222026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

24-03-2026

Filing Number

BA /155/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

BA /65/2026

Registration Date

25-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT Section 20(b)(ii)(c),29

Petitioner(s)

Sri Ranjit Kumar Sahni on behalf of Smt. Rina Devi and Ors. Agniva Chakrabarti, ,Mr DEBALAY BHATTACHARYA,MS RASHMI BHATTACHARJEE,MR SAMAR DAS,MR MIJANUR RAHAMAN

Respondent(s)

The State of Tripura Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

26-03-2026

FOR MOTION

07-04-2026

FOR MOTION

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

The High Court of Tripura granted bail to four women accused (Rina Devi, Rinku Devi, Laxmi Devi, and Gita Devi) who had failed to surrender on the scheduled date and were in custody since February 19, 2026. The court released them on bail of Rs. 1,00,000 each with a public servant surety and imposed weekly court attendance conditions, despite noting their unsatisfactory conduct of breaching previous interim bail conditions, with a warning of custodial trial if similar violations occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Tripura granted bail to four women accused (Rina Devi, Rinku Devi, Laxmi Devi, and Gita Devi) who had failed to surrender on the scheduled date and were in custody since February 19, 2026. The court released them on bail of Rs. 1,00,000 each with a public servant surety and imposed weekly court attendance conditions, despite noting their unsatisfactory conduct of breaching previous interim bail conditions, with a warning of custodial trial if similar violations occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case