Sri Babul Das Sangita Ruhi Das, ,MR PR BARMAN,MR SAMARJIT BHATTACHARJEE,MR KAWSIK NATH,MS ARADHITA DEBBARMA,MR DIPJYOTI PAUL,MS PRAGYA SAHA vs The State of Tripura and 2 others Advocate - GOVT. ADVOCATE, ,Mr MANGAL DEBBARMA — WP(C)/198/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Infractous on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: TRHC010004722026

Filing Number

WP(C)/332/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/198/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITION RELATING TO SERVICE MATTER ( 2 )

Sub-Category

IN-SERVICE DISPUTE ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Infractous

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Babul Das Sangita Ruhi Das, ,MR PR BARMAN,MR SAMARJIT BHATTACHARJEE,MR KAWSIK NATH,MS ARADHITA DEBBARMA,MR DIPJYOTI PAUL,MS PRAGYA SAHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Tripura and 2 others Advocate - GOVT. ADVOCATE, ,Mr MANGAL DEBBARMA

  2. 2.The Inspector General of Prisons,

  3. 3.The Superintendent

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit PalitView PDF

    The writ petition was disposed of after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner's grievance had been fully addressed by the respondent department, leaving nothing for adjudication. Justice Biswajit Palit found the matter resolved and closed the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Motion

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit Palit

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Biswajit PalitView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/198/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition was disposed of after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner's grievance had been fully addressed by the respondent department, leaving nothing for adjudication. Justice Biswajit Palit found the matter resolved and closed the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case