K.Saibabu vs Appellate Authority cum deputy General Manager — WP/4752/2003

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 05th March 2026.

Next hearing 05-Mar-2026

CNR: HBHC011282482003

Filing Number

WP/26893/2003

Filing Date

18-Mar-2003

Registration No

WP/4752/2003

Registration Date

18-Mar-2003

Judge

Juvvadi Sridevi

Coram

Juvvadi Sridevi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

NATIONALISED BANKS ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.Saibabu

    Adv. M SURENDER RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Appellate Authority cum deputy General Manager

Case History

  1. 05-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

    Case Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of three interim applications (I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2020 and I.A.No.1 of 2022) filed in Writ Petition No.4752 of 2003 by K. Saibabu, a dismissed State Bank of Hyderabad employee. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner was not in contact with the counsel on record and requested closure of the applications with liberty to reopen upon the petitioner's approach, which the court granted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Mar-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4752/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of three interim applications (I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2020 and I.A.No.1 of 2022) filed in Writ Petition No.4752 of 2003 by K. Saibabu, a dismissed State Bank of Hyderabad employee. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner was not in contact with the counsel on record and requested closure of the applications with liberty to reopen upon the petitioner's approach, which the court granted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case