E. Narasimha vs Om Prakash Advocate - O MANOHAR REDDY — WA/1611/2018

Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Nov-2018

CNR: HBHC010878152018

Filing Number

WA/67993/2018

Filing Date

22-Nov-2018

Registration No

WA/1611/2018

Registration Date

29-Nov-2018

Judge

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Coram

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.E. Narasimha

    Adv. KUNCHA SUNIL GOUD

  2. 2.E. Krishna

    Adv. M A MUJEEB

  3. 3.E. Satyam

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

  4. 4.E. Balamani

  5. 5.E. Lakshmamma

  6. 6.E. Mallesh

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

  7. 7.E. Mallesh

  8. 8.E. Kumar

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

  9. 9.E. Srinivas

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

  10. 10.E. Ramu

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

  11. 11.E. Kamala Bai

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

  12. 12.E. Vijay Kumar

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

  13. 13.E. Raj Kumar

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

  14. 14.E. Anil Kumar

    Adv. RAKESH SANGHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Om Prakash Advocate - O MANOHAR REDDY

  2. 2.K. Pratap

  3. 3.The Commissioner

    Adv. GP FOR REVENUE (TG)

  4. 4.The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of Writ Appeal No. 1611 of 2018 without costs, affirming the lower court's 2018 order that set aside a survey report regarding disputed land plots in Hydershakote village. The court ruled that while appellants objected to the findings in the fresh survey report, such challenges must be raised before the appropriate forum conducting the survey, not in the writ appeal itself. The appellants were granted liberty to challenge the survey report separately through proper legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Final Hearing

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  10. 19-Jun-2025

    Final Hearing

    Renuka Yara , Sujoy Paul

  11. 30-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  12. 29-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  13. 28-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  14. 25-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  15. 24-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  16. 23-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  17. 22-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  18. 15-Jul-2022

    Admission

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Satish Chandra Sharma

  19. 13-Jun-2022

    Admission

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Satish Chandra Sharma

  20. 06-Jun-2022

    Admission

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Satish Chandra Sharma

  21. 09-Jul-2021

    Adjourned

    B.Vijaysen Reddy , Hima Kohli

  22. 07-Aug-2019

    Admission

    Shameem Akther , Raghvendra Singh Chauhan

  23. 17-Jul-2019

    Shameem Akther,raghvendra Singh ChauhanView PDF

  24. 17-Jul-2019

    For Appearance

    Shameem Akther , Raghvendra Singh Chauhan

  25. 27-Jun-2019

    Shameem Akther,raghvendra Singh ChauhanView PDF

  26. 27-Jun-2019

    For Appearance

    Shameem Akther , Raghvendra Singh Chauhan

  27. 26-Jun-2019

    Shameem Akther,raghvendra Singh ChauhanView PDF

  28. 26-Jun-2019

    Admission

    Shameem Akther , Raghvendra Singh Chauhan

  29. 12-Jun-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  30. 11-Mar-2019

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan,a.rajasheker ReddyView PDF

  31. 11-Mar-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  32. 07-Mar-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  33. 28-Feb-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  34. 25-Feb-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  35. 21-Feb-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  36. 14-Feb-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  37. 11-Feb-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  38. 07-Feb-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  39. 04-Feb-2019

    Admission

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  40. 31-Jan-2019

    Miscellaneous Matters(pre Admission Misc.petition)

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  41. 28-Jan-2019

    Miscellaneous Matters(pre Admission Misc.petition)

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  42. 25-Jan-2019

    Miscellaneous Matters(pre Admission Misc.petition)

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  43. 21-Jan-2019

    Miscellaneous Matters(pre Admission Misc.petition)

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  44. 04-Jan-2019

    Miscellaneous Matters(pre Admission Misc.petition)

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , A.rajasheker Reddy

  45. 03-Jan-2019

    Miscellaneous Matters(pre Admission Misc.petition)

    Thottathil B.radhakrishnan , S.v.bhatt

  46. 30-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 22-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/1611/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of Writ Appeal No. 1611 of 2018 without costs, affirming the lower court's 2018 order that set aside a survey report regarding disputed land plots in Hydershakote village. The court ruled that while appellants objected to the findings in the fresh survey report, such challenges must be raised before the appropriate forum conducting the survey, not in the writ appeal itself. The appellants were granted liberty to challenge the survey report separately through proper legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case