THE DIST.COLLECTOR,HYDERABAD,AND 2 OTRS. vs SRI AYUB KAMAAL,HYDERABAD,AND 16 OTRS. Advocate - VEDULA SRINIVAS — WA/1528/2017

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Dec-2017

CNR: HBHC010873712017

Filing Number

WA/135376/2017

Filing Date

14-Jul-2017

Registration No

WA/1528/2017

Registration Date

13-Oct-2017

Judge

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Coram

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

AP ASSIGNED LANDS(PROHIBITION OF TR ACT 1977) ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE DIST.COLLECTOR,HYDERABAD,AND 2 OTRS.

    Adv. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

  2. 2.Deputy Director of Survey & Land Records, Hyderabad District

  3. 3.The Mandal Revenue Officer, Golkonda Mandal, Hyderabad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI AYUB KAMAAL,HYDERABAD,AND 16 OTRS. Advocate - VEDULA SRINIVAS

  2. 2.M/s. Sandesh Estates (P) Ltd.,

  3. 3.M/s.Gajjala Ram Reddy Properties (P) Ltd.,

  4. 4.M/s.Mouna Estates Private Ltd.,

  5. 5.M/s.Sandesh Constructions Pvt. Ltd.,

  6. 6.M/s.GVR Properties Private Ltd.,

  7. 7.M/s.Mouna Properties Private Ltd.,

  8. 8.M/s.G.S.R.Properties Private Ltd.,

  9. 9.M/s.Gajjala Constructions Private Ltd.,

  10. 10.M/s.Life Style Homes Private Ltd.,

  11. 11.M/s.GMR Constructions Private Ltd.,

  12. 12.M/s.Harini Resorts & Properties Private Ltd.,

  13. 13.M/s.GGR Properties Private Ltd.,

  14. 14.M/s.Mouna Constructions Pvt.Ltd.,

  15. 15.Mrs.Punnam Premaleela, wife of Punnam Satyanarayana Reddy

  16. 16.Shaik Yousuf, S/o.Shaik Mahmood, Occ: Business,

  17. 17.A.V.Jagan Mohan Reddy, S/o.A.Venkat Reddy, Occ: Business,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

    The Telangana High Court dismissed the government's Writ Appeal and upheld the lower court's order directing implementation of a 2009 survey demarcating 6,403 square meters of land in favor of respondent Ayub Kamal. The court found the government could not challenge the unchallenged survey report after 6 years and noted that survey implementation merely identifies land physically through peg-marking without affecting title rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  12. 05-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  14. 02-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  15. 02-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  16. 26-Feb-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  17. 26-Feb-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  18. 23-Feb-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  19. 23-Feb-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  20. 13-Feb-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  21. 23-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  22. 06-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  23. 15-Sep-2025

    Final Hearing

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  24. 01-Sep-2025

    Final Hearing

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  25. 30-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  26. 29-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  27. 28-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  28. 17-Oct-2024

    J Sreenivas Rao,alok AradheView PDF

  29. 17-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  30. 16-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  31. 15-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  32. 04-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  33. 03-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  34. 01-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  35. 30-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  36. 27-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  37. 26-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  38. 25-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  39. 24-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  40. 23-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  41. 21-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  42. 20-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  43. 19-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  44. 18-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  45. 13-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  46. 12-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  47. 11-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  48. 10-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  49. 09-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  50. 06-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  51. 05-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  52. 04-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  53. 03-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  54. 02-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  55. 30-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  56. 29-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  57. 28-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  58. 27-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  59. 23-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  60. 22-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  61. 21-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  62. 20-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  63. 19-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  64. 14-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  65. 13-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  66. 12-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  67. 07-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  68. 06-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  69. 05-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  70. 02-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    J Sreenivas Rao , Alok Aradhe

  71. 01-Aug-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  72. 31-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  73. 30-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  74. 26-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  75. 25-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  76. 24-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  77. 23-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  78. 22-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  79. 19-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  80. 18-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  81. 16-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  82. 15-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  83. 12-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  84. 11-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  85. 10-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  86. 09-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  87. 08-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  88. 05-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  89. 04-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  90. 03-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  91. 02-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  92. 01-Jul-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  93. 28-Jun-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  94. 27-Jun-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  95. 07-Jun-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  96. 06-Jun-2024

    Final Hearing

    Anil Kumar Jukanti , Alok Aradhe

  97. 10-Aug-2022

    Interlocutory

    Surepalli Nanda , Ujjal Bhuyan

  98. 05-Jul-2022

    Interlocutory

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili , Satish Chandra Sharma

  99. 08-Jul-2021

    Adjourned

    B.Vijaysen Reddy , Hima Kohli

  100. 11-Dec-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  101. 14-Jul-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/1528/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court dismissed the government's Writ Appeal and upheld the lower court's order directing implementation of a 2009 survey demarcating 6,403 square meters of land in favor of respondent Ayub Kamal. The court found the government could not challenge the unchallenged survey report after 6 years and noted that survey implementation merely identifies land physically through peg-marking without affecting title rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case