VEDATI LAKSHMI KANTHA, HYDERABAD. vs THE STATE OF TS.,MUN.ADMN.,HYD.,AND 5 OTRS. Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,D L KIRAN PRAKASH — WP/26859/2016

Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010873112016

Filing Number

WP/142965/2016

Filing Date

08-Aug-2016

Registration No

WP/26859/2016

Registration Date

09-Aug-2016

Judge

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Coram

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNCIPALTIES AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VEDATI LAKSHMI KANTHA, HYDERABAD.

    Adv. M N NARASIMHA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF TS.,MUN.ADMN.,HYD.,AND 5 OTRS. Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,D L KIRAN PRAKASH

  2. 2.The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. State of

  3. 3.The Dy Collector / Tahsildar, Balanagar, Ranga Reddy Dist.

  4. 4.The Municipal Commissioner,

  5. 5.The Dy.Commissioner Circle XIV, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy

    Adv. M DHANANJAY REDDY (SC FOR GHMC)

  6. 6.The Avanthi Nagar Thota Welfare

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Specially Identified Cases

    Suddala Chalapathi Rao

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF

    Case WP/26859/2016 was adjourned on 08.06.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel to 18.06.2026. The registry was directed to record the name of Sri K. Ravi Mahender, Standing Counsel for GHMC, as appearing for respondent No.4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Sep-2021

    Adjourned

    A.abhishek Reddy

  5. 03-Mar-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Aug-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/26859/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case WP/26859/2016 was adjourned on 08.06.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel to 18.06.2026. The registry was directed to record the name of Sri K. Ravi Mahender, Standing Counsel for GHMC, as appearing for respondent No.4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case