M/s. Venagro, vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, Advocate - P.S SUJATHA — WP/40594/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010773092025
Filing Number
WP/57441/2025
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
WP/40594/2025
Registration Date
30-Dec-2025
Judge
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
Coram
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
Securitization Act Cases ( 85 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s. Venagro,
Adv. ABHINAV KRISHNA UPPALURI
-
2.Mr. VenuAkula,
-
3.Mr. Tunki Narender Rao,
-
4.Mr. TunkiRaghavender Rao,
-
5.Mrs. Prathima Akula,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, Advocate - P.S SUJATHA
-
2.Mr. K. Rohit Reddy,
Adv. VIVEK JAIN
-
3.The Reserve Bank of India,
Adv. M/S. N LEGAL HYDERABAD
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
04-May-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
SUMMARY: The High Court of Telangana admitted two writ petitions (WP 40594 and 40595 of 2025) challenging a Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal order dated 18.11.2025 that had set aside a favorable DRT-II order from 11.03.2025. The court decided to proceed with hearing the full writ petition rather than merely addressing interim relief, directed the auction purchaser not to take steps rendering the petitions infructuous, granted interim relief to the petitioners, and adjourned the matter to 09.06.2026 for further submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
29-Apr-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
28-Apr-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
27-Apr-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
13-Apr-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
08-Apr-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
30-Mar-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
25-Mar-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
23-Mar-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
18-Mar-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
11-Mar-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
06-Mar-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
27-Feb-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
24-Feb-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
10-Feb-2026
Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
20-Jan-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
For Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
05-Jan-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/40594/2025
SUMMARY: The High Court of Telangana admitted two writ petitions (WP 40594 and 40595 of 2025) challenging a Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal order dated 18.11.2025 that had set aside a favorable DRT-II order from 11.03.2025. The court decided to proceed with hearing the full writ petition rather than merely addressing interim relief, directed the auction purchaser not to take steps rendering the petitions infructuous, granted interim relief to the petitioners, and adjourned the matter to 09.06.2026 for further submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts