Shri.Pasumarthy Ashwin Kumar vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION — WP/37822/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010747722025
Filing Number
WP/55706/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
WP/37822/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Judge
Pulla Karthik
Coram
Pulla Karthik
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
STAMPS & REGISTRATION ( 70 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri.Pasumarthy Ashwin Kumar
Adv. ARUN KUMAR SATYAVOLU
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION
-
2.The Assitant Registrar of Chits
-
3.M/s Kapil Chits (Kosta) Private Limited
Adv. K SUDHAKAR REDDY
-
4.The Arbitrator / Deputy Registrar of Chits
-
5.Sri Pasumarthy Ramana Rao
-
6.Shri.Pasumarthy Suryanarayana Rajendra
-
7.Sri Pasumarthy Surya Narayana
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
28-Apr-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
The case has been adjourned to 23.06.2026 to allow the respondents' counsel to file a counter affidavit. The High Court of Telangana granted this adjournment at the request of the learned counsel for the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
13-Apr-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
03-Mar-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
24-Feb-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
K. SarathView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
K. SarathView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Admission (Stamps And Registration )
K. Sarath
-
10-Dec-2025
K. SarathView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/37822/2025
The case has been adjourned to 23.06.2026 to allow the respondents' counsel to file a counter affidavit. The High Court of Telangana granted this adjournment at the request of the learned counsel for the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts