Shri.Pasumarthy Ashwin Kumar vs The State of Telangana — WP/37450/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010747662025
Filing Number
WP/55704/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
WP/37450/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Judge
Pulla Karthik
Coram
Pulla Karthik
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
T.S.CHIT FUNDS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri.Pasumarthy Ashwin Kumar
Adv. ARUN KUMAR SATYAVOLU
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana
-
2.The Assitant Registrar of Chits
-
3.M/s Kapil Chits (Kosta) Private Limited
Adv. K SUDHAKAR REDDY
-
4.The Arbitrator / Deputy Registrar of Chits
-
5.Sri Pasumarthy Ramana Rao
-
6.Sri Pasumarthy Surya Narayana
-
7.Sri Puchakayala Kamalakar
-
8.Shri.Pasumarthy Suryanarayana Rajendra
-
9.Sri Joparthi Rameswara Rao
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
28-Apr-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Telangana adjourned the hearing in writ petitions WP.NO. 37438, 37450, 37615, 37822, and 38185 of 2025 to 23.06.2026. The adjournment was granted at the request of the respondents' counsel to allow time for filing a counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
13-Apr-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
03-Mar-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Admission
Pulla Karthik
-
24-Feb-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
K. SarathView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
K. SarathView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Admission (Stamps And Registration )
K. Sarath
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/37450/2025
Summary: The High Court of Telangana adjourned the hearing in writ petitions WP.NO. 37438, 37450, 37615, 37822, and 38185 of 2025 to 23.06.2026. The adjournment was granted at the request of the respondents' counsel to allow time for filing a counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts