Dudam Sagar vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/36753/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
CNR: HBHC010716122024
Filing Number
WP/52545/2024
Filing Date
27-Dec-2024
Registration No
WP/36753/2024
Registration Date
27-Dec-2024
Judge
E.V. Venugopal
Coram
E.V. Venugopal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 43 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dudam Sagar
Adv. DORNALA SAI MAHITHA
-
2.Satish Mandala
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India
-
2.National institute of Technology
-
3.National Institute of Technology
-
4.National Institute of Technology
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Jul-2026
Admission (Service Matters)
E.V. Venugopal
-
16-Jun-2026
E.V. Venugopal
-
24-Jan-2025
Admission (Education )
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
27-Dec-2024
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
Case Summary: WP 36753/2024 Outcome: Case adjourned to 24.01.2025. Court issued interim order restraining NIT Warangal from proceeding with Senior Superintendent promotions until further orders, effectively placing all such promotions on hold pending final hearing. Issue: Two NIT Warangal Superintendents challenged promotion of junior-ranked candidates to Senior Superintendent positions, alleging violation of seniority norms and constitutional rights to equality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP/36753/2024
Case Summary: WP 36753/2024 Outcome: Case adjourned to 24.01.2025. Court issued interim order restraining NIT Warangal from proceeding with Senior Superintendent promotions until further orders, effectively placing all such promotions on hold pending final hearing. Issue: Two NIT Warangal Superintendents challenged promotion of junior-ranked candidates to Senior Superintendent positions, alleging violation of seniority norms and constitutional rights to equality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts