Sri A.Ram Raj vs The Commissioner, LB. Nagar Municipality Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,N SHOBA,T B B KRISHNA MOHAN,SRINIVAS RAO PACHWA (SC FOR GHMC) — WP/40744/2014
Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION on 26th March 2026.
CNR: HBHC010694452014
Filing Number
WP/220154/2014
Filing Date
29-Dec-2014
Registration No
WP/40744/2014
Registration Date
29-Dec-2014
Judge
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Coram
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP. ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri A.Ram Raj
Adv. S R SANKU AND KAVITI MURALI KRISHNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Commissioner, LB. Nagar Municipality Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,N SHOBA,T B B KRISHNA MOHAN,SRINIVAS RAO PACHWA (SC FOR GHMC)
-
2.The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No.3, L.B.Nagar,
Adv. SRINIVAS RAO PACHWA (SC FOR GHMC)
-
3.The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, East Zone,
Adv. SRINIVAS RAO PACHWA (SC FOR GHMC)
-
4.The State of Telangana, Department of Municipal Administrati
-
5.B.Vijaya Bhaskar,S/o B.C.Narayana,
-
6.Hyderabad City Employees Co-Operative House Building
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
For Dismissal
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
-
25-Mar-2026
Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF
On 25.03.2026, the Telangana High Court posted Writ Petition No. 40744 of 2014 for dismissal on 26.03.2026 because no one appeared for the petitioner, indicating potential dismissal for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to pursue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2018
For Admission (Cc Matters)
B.siva Sankara Rao
-
01-Jun-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Dec-2014
Case filed
Registration No. WP/40744/2014
On 25.03.2026, the Telangana High Court posted Writ Petition No. 40744 of 2014 for dismissal on 26.03.2026 because no one appeared for the petitioner, indicating potential dismissal for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to pursue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts