The Superintending Engineer vs Smt. Lagisetti Sulochana Advocate - P BHARATH BABU — WA/1338/2025

Case under The Telangana Irrigation Act Section 15. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HBHC010649012025

e-Filing Number

28-10-2025

Filing Number

WA/48444/2025

Filing Date

28-Oct-2025

Registration No

WA/1338/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Judge

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Telangana Irrigation Act Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Superintending Engineer

    Adv. GP FOR SERVICES I

  2. 2.The Chief Engineer

  3. 3.The Engineer - in - Chief

  4. 4.The State of Telangana

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Lagisetti Sulochana Advocate - P BHARATH BABU

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

    Case Status Summary: In W.A. No.1338 of 2025 before the High Court for the State of Telangana, the matter was adjourned for one week on 25.03.2026. The adjournment was granted as prayed by the Government Pleader for Services-I (appearing for appellants) with the consent of the Senior Counsel representing the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Nov-2025

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

  4. 28-Nov-2025

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    For Admission (Fresh Matters)

    Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/1338/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: In W.A. No.1338 of 2025 before the High Court for the State of Telangana, the matter was adjourned for one week on 25.03.2026. The adjournment was granted as prayed by the Government Pleader for Services-I (appearing for appellants) with the consent of the Senior Counsel representing the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case