NTR Nagar Slum Dwellers Uplifting Society vs The State of Telangana Represented by its Principle Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,RAJENDER REDDY KAMATAM — WP/8519/2017

Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010597632017

Filing Number

WP/45940/2017

Filing Date

09-Mar-2017

Registration No

WP/8519/2017

Registration Date

09-Mar-2017

Judge

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Coram

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

DEMOLITION-REMOVAL ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NTR Nagar Slum Dwellers Uplifting Society

    Adv. P SRI RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Represented by its Principle Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,RAJENDER REDDY KAMATAM

  2. 2.The Commissioner East Zone - Greater Hyderabad

    Adv. SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY(SC FORGHMC)

  3. 3.Sri Sai Ayyappa Constructions, Rep. by M.P.K. Ravikumar,

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/8519/2017 On 10.06.2026, the Telangana High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by NTR Nagar Slum Dwellers Uplifting Society against the State of Telangana and others to 12.06.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. The court directed that Mr. Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, Standing Counsel for GHMC, be noted as counsel for respondent No. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2017

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    Challa Kodanda Ram

  4. 09-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8519/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/8519/2017 On 10.06.2026, the Telangana High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by NTR Nagar Slum Dwellers Uplifting Society against the State of Telangana and others to 12.06.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. The court directed that Mr. Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, Standing Counsel for GHMC, be noted as counsel for respondent No. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case