State Bank of India (SBI) vs Before the Appellate Authority Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/35590/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

CNR: HBHC010555882021

Filing Number

WP/44210/2021

Filing Date

21-Dec-2021

Registration No

WP/35590/2021

Registration Date

22-Dec-2021

Judge

T.madhavi Devi

Coram

T.madhavi Devi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PAYMENT OF GRATUTITY ACT COMPUTATION ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Bank of India (SBI)

    Adv. V UMA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Before the Appellate Authority Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.Before the Controlling Authority

  3. 3.The Union of India

  4. 4.Bahumanyam Murali Krishna

    Adv. SAI PRASEN GUNDAVARAM

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Admission

    T.madhavi Devi

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

  4. 24-Jan-2022

    Admission

    Abhinand Kumar Shavili

  5. 27-Dec-2021

    Abhinand Kumar ShaviliView PDF

  6. 27-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/35590/2021

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Telangana issued a show-cause notice to all respondents (returnable on 07.02.2022) directing them to explain why the writ petition challenging the appellate authority's gratuity order should not be admitted. Importantly, an interim suspension of the impugned order dated 26.10.2021 was granted, subject to the petitioner (State Bank of India) depositing 50% of the adjudicated amount, with the workman permitted to withdraw it upon furnishing a bank guarantee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case