GAJULA SANDEEP vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/9647/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED NO COSTS on 28th March 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010539702021

Filing Number

CRLP/11053/2021

Filing Date

15-Dec-2021

Registration No

CRLP/9647/2021

Registration Date

16-Dec-2021

Judge

K.surender

Coram

K.surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

28-Mar-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAJULA SANDEEP

    Adv. J SURESH BABU

  2. 2.GAJULA CHNADRA MOULI

  3. 3.GAJULA LAXMI

  4. 4.KUNCHANA SANDHYA

  5. 5.BETHI SWATHI

  6. 6.PARIPELLY DIVYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.CHINTHAKINDI SRUTHI

    Adv. PULLA RAO YELLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    K.surenderView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court partially allowed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., quashing proceedings against five accused (A-2 to A-6) while allowing proceedings against the main accused (A-1) to continue. The court found that A-2 to A-6 (parents-in-law and sisters-in-law) were implicated solely on vague and omnibus allegations without specific allegations, citing the Supreme Court's principle that absence of distinct allegations warrants quashing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2025

    Admission

    E.V. Venugopal

  4. 20-Feb-2025

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

  5. 20-Feb-2025

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

  6. 20-Feb-2025

    Admission

    E.V. Venugopal

  7. 13-Feb-2025

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

  8. 13-Feb-2025

    Admission

    E.V. Venugopal

  9. 30-Jan-2025

    E.V. VenugopalView PDF

  10. 17-Sep-2024

    Admission(quash Matters)

    K. Sujana

  11. 13-Aug-2024

    K. SujanaView PDF

  12. 22-Jul-2022

    For Admission

    K.lakshman

  13. 30-Jun-2022

    K.lakshmanView PDF

  14. 30-Jun-2022

    For Admission

    K.lakshman

  15. 24-Jan-2022

    Admission

    K.lakshman

  16. 21-Jan-2022

    Admission

    K.lakshman

  17. 20-Jan-2022

    Admission

    K.lakshman

  18. 19-Jan-2022

    Admission

    K.lakshman

  19. 07-Jan-2022

    Admission

    K.lakshman

  20. 06-Jan-2022

    Admission

    K.lakshman

  21. 24-Dec-2021

    Admission

    K.lakshman

  22. 22-Dec-2021

    For Admission

    Shameem Akther

  23. 17-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 15-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/9647/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court partially allowed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., quashing proceedings against five accused (A-2 to A-6) while allowing proceedings against the main accused (A-1) to continue. The court found that A-2 to A-6 (parents-in-law and sisters-in-law) were implicated solely on vague and omnibus allegations without specific allegations, citing the Supreme Court's principle that absence of distinct allegations warrants quashing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case