Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences vs Aakukota Urmila Advocate - SRIDHAR LONKALA — WA/257/2026
Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.
CNR: HBHC010536162025
e-Filing Number
04-09-2025
Filing Number
WA/40013/2025
Filing Date
04-Sep-2025
Registration No
WA/257/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Judge
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 27 )
Sub-Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences
Adv. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
-
2.The Medical Superintendent
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aakukota Urmila Advocate - SRIDHAR LONKALA
-
2.Mohammed Mahamood
-
3.Ganapathi Narasamma
-
4.Gajjela Narsimha
-
5.T.Bixapathi
-
6.Dundi Satyavathi
-
7.Gadha Laxmibai
-
8.T.Bikshamaiah
-
9.Chintala Sreedhar
-
10.Savalla Ramachandraiah
-
11.Madugula Adam
-
12.K. Rajesh
-
13.Alampally Lalitha
-
14.Gajupagulla Thirumalaiah
-
15.Darla Elizabeth Rani
-
16.Enukathala Narsimhulu
-
17.Rani Garanala
-
18.Maryelloh Manemma
-
19.Savalla Laxmi
-
20.Mangalagiri Jahange
-
21.Kommagolla Suresh
-
22.Pandla Krishnamurthy
-
23.Manda Estheru
-
24.Pull Anuradha
-
25.Bogee Sangeeta
-
26.Varmudla Praveen Kumar
-
27.Madana Srinivasulu
-
28.Panthulu Kawsaliya
-
29.Konaboina Yadagiri
-
30.Dastha Giramma
-
31.Bopi Kalavathi
-
32.G. Anasuya
-
33.Bondili Sathis Singh
-
34.Jakkani Daniel
-
35.Gazarala Suvarna
-
36.Chintala Venkatesh
-
37.Gaddarn Prabha
-
38.Purudu Chandrakala
-
39.Shabad Dayakar Goud
-
40.Rasheeda Begum
-
41.Mushigumpaa Kanalakalaxmi
-
42.Munigalla Yadamma
-
43.Konapuram Rama Mohan
-
44.Penumaka Veera Swami
-
45.Konda Neelavathi
-
46.Raziya Sultana
-
47.Tapetla Swaroopa
-
48.Bandirala Aruna
-
49.Bolishetty Gruhalaxmi
-
50.Bejawada Yesamma
-
51.Gouddhola Kalavathi Goud
-
52.Malchalam Narshing Rao
-
53.Gillolu Sanjeev Kumar
-
54.Mukkera Srihari
-
55.Kundeti Kamalamma
-
56.Kummari Srinivas
-
57.Maskuri Venkatesh
-
58.Pegidi Vinayak Rao
-
59.Putti Lakshmi Bai
-
60.Chalawadi Veeranna
-
61.Manikonda Sridhar
-
62.Dakur Balamani
-
63.Rachuri Saroopa Rani
-
64.Madugani Lingamaiah
-
65.Malga Rajaiah
-
66.Ganapuram David
-
67.Chakali Venkataiah
-
68.T Venkatesh
-
69.A Srinivas Raju
-
70.Konuru Srinivasa Rao
-
71.S.Bhikshapathy
-
72.M Nageshwar Rao
-
73.M Sharada
-
74.G Prabhavathi
-
75.Sarikonda Srinivasa Raju
-
76.J Nagamani
-
77.Mohammed Ghouse
-
78.Katla Bhasker Goud
-
79.Musali Hanmappa
-
80.State of Telangana
Adv. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW
-
81.The Director of Medical Education
-
82.Union of India
Adv. N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
The High Court of Telangana allowed the writ appeal (W.A.No.257 of 2026) on 31.03.2026. Prior to the substantive decision, the court condoned delays of 28 days and 160 days in filing the appeal through separate interim applications (I.A.No.1 and I.A.No.2), accepting the appellants' explanations for the delays. The detailed reasoning is provided in a separate judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Admission
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
-
16-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WA/257/2026
The High Court of Telangana allowed the writ appeal (W.A.No.257 of 2026) on 31.03.2026. Prior to the substantive decision, the court condoned delays of 28 days and 160 days in filing the appeal through separate interim applications (I.A.No.1 and I.A.No.2), accepting the appellants' explanations for the delays. The detailed reasoning is provided in a separate judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts