SMT.PEDDI CHAYA RANI, HYDERABAD vs PRL SECY, DEPT OF MUN ADMN, HYD AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,VSRMV PRASAD SANAKA,GP FOR HOME,0 — WP/9602/2014

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Apr-2014

CNR: HBHC010512092014

Filing Number

WP/53748/2014

Filing Date

27-Mar-2014

Registration No

WP/9602/2014

Registration Date

27-Mar-2014

Judge

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Coram

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP. ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 20-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT.PEDDI CHAYA RANI, HYDERABAD

    Adv. G RAJU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRL SECY, DEPT OF MUN ADMN, HYD AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,VSRMV PRASAD SANAKA,GP FOR HOME,0

  2. 2.The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

  3. 3.The Deputy Commissioner

    Adv. M DHANANJAY REDDY (SC FOR GHMC)

  4. 4.The Commissioner of Police

  5. 5.The Station House Officer

  6. 6.Smt.Rajya Laxmi, W/o.V.Ravinder

  7. 7.V.Ravinder, S/o Narasimha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal

    Suddala Chalapathi Rao

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF

    On 13.04.2026, the High Court of Telangana noted that the petitioner failed to appear while respondents (GHMC and others) were represented. The court adjourned the matter to 15.04.2026 for dismissal, indicating the petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Sep-2021

    Adjourned

    A.abhishek Reddy

  5. 04-Apr-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Mar-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9602/2014

casestatus.in Summary

On 13.04.2026, the High Court of Telangana noted that the petitioner failed to appear while respondents (GHMC and others) were represented. The court adjourned the matter to 15.04.2026 for dismissal, indicating the petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case