K. Srikanth vs The APGENCO, rep. by its Managing Director, Advocate - K UDAYA SRI — WP/4081/2011
Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010465262011
Filing Number
WP/21705/2011
Filing Date
18-Feb-2011
Registration No
WP/4081/2011
Registration Date
19-Feb-2011
Judge
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
Coram
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 25 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K. Srikanth
Adv. G V SHIVAJI
-
2.P. Rama Rao
-
3.Y.V.R.K. Chandrasekhar
-
4.N.V. Veerabhadra Rao
-
5.N. Vasu Prakash
-
6.N. Venkata Rao
-
7.P.Ramesh Kumar Reddy
Respondent(s)
-
1.The APGENCO, rep. by its Managing Director, Advocate - K UDAYA SRI
-
2.The Chief General Manager (HR), APGENCO,
Adv. V UMA DEVI (SC FOR GENCO)
-
3.The Chief Engineer, O & M,
-
4.The Chief Engineer, O & M,
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
Specially Identified Cases
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
-
16-Jun-2026
Laxmi Narayana AlishettyView PDF
Case Summary: WP.No.4081/2011 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Telangana adjourned the writ petition to 30.06.2026 as a final opportunity to ascertain whether the cause of action still survives. Both counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for APGENCO were present during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Feb-2024
Specially Identified Cases
Juvvadi Sridevi
-
04-Jan-2024
Specially Identified Cases
Juvvadi Sridevi
-
09-Nov-2023
Specially Identified Cases
Nagesh Bheemapaka
-
09-Nov-2023
Specially Identified Cases
Nagesh Bheemapaka
-
30-Oct-2023
Specially Identified Cases
Nagesh Bheemapaka
-
14-Sep-2021
Adjourned
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
-
26-Jul-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2011
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4081/2011
Case Summary: WP.No.4081/2011 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Telangana adjourned the writ petition to 30.06.2026 as a final opportunity to ascertain whether the cause of action still survives. Both counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for APGENCO were present during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts