Mohd.Munawar, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - RAPARTHI VENKATESH (SC FOR GHMC TELANGANA), ,THE ADVOCATE GENERAL,GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION — WP/9142/2017

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Aug-2017

CNR: HBHC010408942017

Filing Number

WP/49548/2017

Filing Date

14-Mar-2017

Registration No

WP/9142/2017

Registration Date

14-Mar-2017

Judge

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Coram

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF HYDERABAD ( 25 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohd.Munawar,

    Adv. B SRINIVASULU

  2. 2.Mumtaz Begum,

  3. 3.Raheemunnisa Begum,

  4. 4.Syed Aziz,

  5. 5.Parveen Begum,

  6. 6.Anwari Begum,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - RAPARTHI VENKATESH (SC FOR GHMC TELANGANA), ,THE ADVOCATE GENERAL,GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION

  2. 2.The Grater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,

    Adv. RAPARTHI VENKATESH (SC FOR GHMC TELANGANA)

  3. 3.The Tahsildar, Charminar Mandal, Hyderabad.

  4. 4.The Hyderabad Metro Rail Project,

    Adv. P RADHIVE REDDY

  5. 5.The Special Deputy Collector,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal(specially Identified Cases)

    Suddala Chalapathi Rao

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF

    On 11.06.2026, the court noted no representation from petitioners and posted the matter for dismissal on 12.06.2026. The court directed the registry to record Sri Raparthy Venkatesh as Standing Counsel for GHMC (respondents 1 and 2). The case appears to be proceeding toward dismissal due to petitioners' absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  5. 08-Mar-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  6. 07-Mar-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  7. 06-Mar-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  8. 05-Mar-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  9. 01-Mar-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  10. 28-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  11. 27-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  12. 26-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  13. 22-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  14. 21-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  15. 20-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  16. 19-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  17. 16-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  18. 15-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  19. 14-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  20. 09-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  21. 08-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  22. 07-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  23. 06-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  24. 05-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  25. 02-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  26. 01-Feb-2018

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B.siva Sankara Rao

  27. 17-Aug-2017

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    Raja Elango

  28. 14-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9142/2017

  29. 01-Jan-1900

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

On 11.06.2026, the court noted no representation from petitioners and posted the matter for dismissal on 12.06.2026. The court directed the registry to record Sri Raparthy Venkatesh as Standing Counsel for GHMC (respondents 1 and 2). The case appears to be proceeding toward dismissal due to petitioners' absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case