Sanda Vajramma vs State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/24626/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HBHC010395632021

Filing Number

WP/31003/2021

Filing Date

29-Sep-2021

Registration No

WP/24626/2021

Registration Date

30-Sep-2021

Judge

Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

Coram

Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanda Vajramma

    Adv. CH RAVI KUMAR

  2. 2.Nallola Yadamma

  3. 3.Tandra Mangamma

  4. 4.Jilamoni Manjula

  5. 5.Jakkartha Lavanya

  6. 6.Mote Sattemma

  7. 7.Kanemoni Acchemma

  8. 8.Mote Yadamma

  9. 9.Mote Padma

  10. 10.Nallola Mallamma

  11. 11.Jakkartha Samantha

  12. 12.Mekala Indramma

  13. 13.Godasu Bhyagyamma

  14. 14.Morgu Jyothi

  15. 15.Manda Sayamma

  16. 16.Golkonda Hamsa

  17. 17.Andoju Vimalamma

  18. 18.Andoju Maunika

  19. 19.Andoju Vajramma

  20. 20.Golkonda Yadamma

  21. 21.Vaddemoni Indiramma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The State of Telangana

    Adv. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE (TG)

  3. 3.Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC)

    Adv. M SRIKANTH REDDY (SC FOR TGIIC)

  4. 4.Commissioner

  5. 5.District Collector

    Adv. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (TG)

  6. 6.Additional Collector and Administrator

  7. 7.Land Acquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer

    Adv. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (TG)

  8. 8.Tahsildar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

    Summary The High Court for the State of Telangana (Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy) reserved orders in two consolidated writ petitions (WP Nos. 14670 and 24626 of 2021) challenging land acquisition declarations for the proposed Green Pharma City project. The petitions, filed by agricultural workers from Medipally and Kurmidda villages, sought to set aside acquisition notifications claiming the authorities failed to follow due process and did not prepare a Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme. The court extended interim orders restraining possession of the subject agricultural lands pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  9. 10-Apr-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  11. 01-Apr-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  12. 01-Apr-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  14. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  15. 24-Feb-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  16. 24-Feb-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  17. 24-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

  18. 17-Feb-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  19. 17-Feb-2026

    Vakiti Ramakrishna ReddyView PDF

  20. 24-Apr-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  21. 17-Apr-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  22. 10-Apr-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  23. 03-Apr-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  24. 27-Mar-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  25. 20-Mar-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  26. 13-Mar-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  27. 06-Mar-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  28. 02-Mar-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  29. 28-Feb-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  30. 24-Feb-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  31. 23-Feb-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  32. 22-Feb-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  33. 21-Feb-2023

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  34. 20-Feb-2023

    Part-Heard

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  35. 14-Feb-2023

    Part-Heard

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  36. 13-Feb-2023

    Part-Heard

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  37. 09-Feb-2023

    Part-Heard

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  38. 31-Jan-2023

    Part-Heard

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  39. 25-Jan-2023

    Part-Heard

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  40. 24-Jan-2023

    Part-Heard

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  41. 23-Jan-2023

    Part-Heard

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  42. 19-Jan-2023

    For Admission & Hearing

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  43. 10-Jan-2023

    For Admission & Hearing

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  44. 05-Jan-2023

    For Admission & Hearing

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  45. 02-Jan-2023

    For Admission & Hearing

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  46. 03-Nov-2022

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  47. 19-Oct-2022

    Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  48. 17-Oct-2022

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  49. 26-Sep-2022

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  50. 26-Sep-2022

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  51. 30-Mar-2022

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    A.abhishek Reddy

  52. 02-Mar-2022

    A.abhishek Reddy

  53. 02-Mar-2022

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    A.abhishek Reddy

  54. 28-Feb-2022

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    A.abhishek Reddy

  55. 07-Feb-2022

    A.abhishek Reddy

  56. 24-Jan-2022

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    T.vinod Kumar

  57. 13-Dec-2021

    T.vinod KumarView PDF

  58. 13-Dec-2021

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    T.vinod Kumar

  59. 15-Nov-2021

    T.vinod KumarView PDF

  60. 26-Oct-2021

    T.vinod KumarView PDF

  61. 26-Oct-2021

    Admission

    T.vinod Kumar

  62. 25-Oct-2021

    Admission (Revenue-La)

    K.lakshman

  63. 01-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 29-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/24626/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court for the State of Telangana (Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy) reserved orders in two consolidated writ petitions (WP Nos. 14670 and 24626 of 2021) challenging land acquisition declarations for the proposed Green Pharma City project. The petitions, filed by agricultural workers from Medipally and Kurmidda villages, sought to set aside acquisition notifications claiming the authorities failed to follow due process and did not prepare a Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme. The court extended interim orders restraining possession of the subject agricultural lands pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case