Aelugani Dhanam Raju vs State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND COMM AREA DEV — WP/19126/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010393772026
Filing Number
WP/28490/2026
Filing Date
18-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/19126/2026
Registration Date
18-Jun-2026
Judge
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
Coram
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MISCELLANEOUS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aelugani Dhanam Raju
Adv. LINGALA SUDHEER
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND COMM AREA DEV
-
2.Executive Engineer,
-
3.Dy. Executive Engineer,
-
4.Hyderabad Municipal Development Authority
-
5.The Collector
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
-
6.Revenue Divisional Officer,
-
7.Tahsildar,
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Admission (Irrigation)
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
-
19-Jun-2026
Namavarapu Rajeshwar RaoView PDF
Case Summary: WP/19126/2026 Petitioner Aelugani Dhanam Raju challenged the demarcation of Abu Kunta land (15.66 acres) in Nagireddyguda village by irrigation and HMDA authorities under the Telangana Irrigation Act and HMDA Act 2008, claiming the action was without jurisdiction, illegal, and violated natural justice. The case was adjourned to 23.07.2026 with a status quo order maintaining the existing possession of petitioner's patta land. The court directed respondent No. 4 (HMDA) to produce relevant records by the next hearing, with the status quo order subject to vacation if those records prove the petitioner's submissions false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/19126/2026
Case Summary: WP/19126/2026 Petitioner Aelugani Dhanam Raju challenged the demarcation of Abu Kunta land (15.66 acres) in Nagireddyguda village by irrigation and HMDA authorities under the Telangana Irrigation Act and HMDA Act 2008, claiming the action was without jurisdiction, illegal, and violated natural justice. The case was adjourned to 23.07.2026 with a status quo order maintaining the existing possession of petitioner's patta land. The court directed respondent No. 4 (HMDA) to produce relevant records by the next hearing, with the status quo order subject to vacation if those records prove the petitioner's submissions false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts