Banda Krishna vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/19041/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010392852026
Filing Number
WP/28426/2026
Filing Date
18-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/19041/2026
Registration Date
18-Jun-2026
Judge
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Coram
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
NOT TO INTERFERE ( 40 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Banda Krishna
Adv. RAMULU PASUPULA
-
2.Banda Ramulu
-
3.Banda Janglaiah
-
4.Banda Nagabhushanam
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
-
2.The HMWSSB
-
3.The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
-
4.The District Collector
-
5.The Tahsildar
-
6.The Inspector of Police
Adv. GP FOR HOME
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
Case Summary: WP 19041/2026 The Telangana High Court issued an interim direction protecting the petitioners' (Banda Krishna, Banda Ramulu, Banda Janglaiah, and Banda Nagabhushanam) possession of lands in survey numbers 132 and 134 in Mailardevpally Village. The court directed respondents 2-5 not to interfere with the petitioners' lands without following due process of law, though this does not prevent the authorities from issuing notices or conducting boundary surveys to demarcate the disputed lands. The case is listed for further hearing on 09.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
-
18-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/19041/2026
Case Summary: WP 19041/2026 The Telangana High Court issued an interim direction protecting the petitioners' (Banda Krishna, Banda Ramulu, Banda Janglaiah, and Banda Nagabhushanam) possession of lands in survey numbers 132 and 134 in Mailardevpally Village. The court directed respondents 2-5 not to interfere with the petitioners' lands without following due process of law, though this does not prevent the authorities from issuing notices or conducting boundary surveys to demarcate the disputed lands. The case is listed for further hearing on 09.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts